At the midpoint, it is safe to assume an absolute minimum of five NCAA Tourney bids, with a sixth being highly likely and a seventh being a remote, but unlikely possibility.
Here's where we stand so far:
SHOULD BE IN: Minnesota
POSSIBLE, BUT UNLIKELY: Northwestern, Penn State
NO SHOT: Michigan. Indiana, Iowa
Ohio State is #1 in the country and shows no signs of slowing down. Tonight's visit from Purdue will be a nice test for the Buckeyes coming off their emotional win Saturday in Champagne. They have the inside/outside balance needed for a deep run to the Final Four and more. They won't run the table, and could even lose tonight to Purdue, but I'd be surprised if they drop more than three or four games all year. Expect the Buckeyes to be a #1 seed in March.
Purdue is an interesting case. People have focused so much on who they are missing (Robbie Hummel) they've overlooked two All-American candidates they do have in E'Twaun Moore and JuJuan Johnson. The senior inside/out combo is as good as any pair in the country and give Purdue the core to make a run at the Final Four. I've liked this team all season - and they are only getting better as their role players begin to get some confidence and court time. They could end up as high as a #1 seed with a nice run to win the Big Ten, but more likely settle in around the #3 line.
It's almost February, so that must mean it is time for Michigan State to start turning it on in preparation for March. Tom Izzo has perfected the "Final Four run from a 3 or 4 seed" act many times, and might just do it again this year. The Spartans certainly have the talent to be a top seed, but like Purdue, likely settle around the #3 line.
Illinois is another team with the personnel to make a deep run in March. Their record suggests I should have them slotted behind Minnesota and Wisconsin, but Illinois gets the "lock" nod due to who they have played and lost to. Losses to Texas, Missouri and Wisconsin away from home shouldn't drop the Illini too far in the committee's eyes. They'll still likely endure a handfull of losses, but should have a strong enough body of work to land safely in the 4/5 seed range.
Wisconsin strikes again. They don't have NBA talent loading up their roster like some of their Big Ten counterparts, but all Bo Ryan and his Badgers do is win win win no matter what. Currently 5-2 in conference, the Badgers are in position to finish second in arguably the top league in the country. Trips to Ohio State and Purdue still loom, but the Badgers propensity to hammer lesser opponents (including this weekend 32-point drubbing of Northwestern) serves them favorably for an 11 or 12 win season and as high as a #3 seed, but no certainly no worse than a #5 seed in March.
Minnesota is all but a lock, but their lack of marquee wins means they still need to hold up over the rigors of Big Ten play. Early neutral court wins over North Carolina and West Virginia help, but the real bulk of their Big Ten schedule is still to come. The 3-point loss at Ohio State is encouraging, as is the home win over Purdue. They only have four games left in conference against the "Top 5" so their home and homes with Northwestern and Indiana are vital to sweep. My call - Minnesota lands around a #6 seed.
What to make of Northwestern? They looked good in blowout wins over Indiana, Iowa and Michigan - as well as in tight three and four point losses against Michigan State. This is also the team that took a 32-point drubbing by Wisconsin and a 25-point loss at Illinois. Simply put? The Wildcats are just OK - not terrible, yet nowhere close to the class of the Big Ten's elite. That likely earns them a seventh place finish and yet another berth in the NIT.
Penn State is another team that is likely not making the Big Dance, but man are they giving teams fits in conference play. The are only 3-4 in league play, but an impressive 3-4 it is; they own wins over Michigan State and Illinois and two road losses to Ohio State by just three and Purdue on a last-second buzzer beater, 63-62. Those are their four most recent games. So - does that great play translate into wins over the bottom half of the conference? If it does, it isn't unreasonable to think Penn State could sneak up to 9-9, possibly even better in conference. It may not be enough to get them to the tourney in Talor Battle's senior year, but the Nittany Lions are sure going to make things interesting.
Indiana fans surely must be growing impatient. It's now year three of the Tom Crean Era, and there is little evidence of progress. At least Hoosier fans can take solace knowing their good friends in Lexington were in the exact same spot three years ago and their rebuilding took Coach Cal about 45 minutes and four phone calls... The Hoosiers are simply outclassed in Big Ten play. They lack the size, the scoring, the depth - basically everything needed to compete. Even the NIT is a stretch for IU. Consider Crean on the clock next season.
Michigan is a program that continues to perplex me. They have tradition, facilities, resources, a good coach; yet they continue to flounder on the edge of irrelevance. They gave Kansas a heck of a fight earlier this year, showing some signs of life, but at 1-6 in conference with trips to Ohio State, Michigan State, Illinois and Minnesota still remaining Michigan is looking a terrible conference season, and an overall sub-.500 season squarely in the face. If not for the relative failures of the two coaches who preceded him, I'd say Beilein has reason to be nervous... and actually still might.
The pen is mightier than the team... |
No comments:
Post a Comment